mirror of
https://github.com/mpusz/mp-units.git
synced 2025-08-01 03:14:29 +02:00
docs: code fragments fixed in the poll titles
This commit is contained in:
@@ -48,37 +48,37 @@ paper is expected to progress to LEWG (Library Evolution Working Group) in St. L
|
||||
|
||||
Plenty of polls were taken:
|
||||
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing std::basic_fixed_string, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work."
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing `std::basic_fixed_string`, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work."
|
||||
|
||||
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|
||||
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
|
||||
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal be consteval?"
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal be `consteval`?"
|
||||
|
||||
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|
||||
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
|
||||
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Do we want to add .view()?"
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Do we want to add `.view()`?"
|
||||
|
||||
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|
||||
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
|
||||
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Do we want the .size member to be an integral_constant<size_t, N> (and .empty to be bool_constant<N==0>)?"
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Do we want the `.size` member to be an `integral_constant<size_t, N>` (and `.empty` to be `bool_constant<N==0>`)?"
|
||||
|
||||
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|
||||
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
|
||||
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Should the index operator[] return a reference to const?"
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Should the index `operator[]` return a reference to `const`?"
|
||||
|
||||
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|
||||
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
|
||||
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal have a precondition that txt[N] == 0?"
|
||||
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal have a precondition that `txt[N] == 0`?"
|
||||
|
||||
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|
||||
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user