mpusz/mp-units
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/mpusz/mp-units.git synced 2025-08-02 11:54:27 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: code fragments fixed in the poll titles

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mateusz Pusz
2024-04-19 18:36:40 +01:00
parent eb6e331de7
commit 0f0d7d8715
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
docs/blog/posts/tokyo-2024-report.md
View File

@@ -48,37 +48,37 @@ paper is expected to progress to LEWG (Library Evolution Working Group) in St. L
Plenty of polls were taken: Plenty of polls were taken:
!!! question "POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing std::basic_fixed_string, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work." !!! question "POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing `std::basic_fixed_string`, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work."
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal be consteval?" !!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal be `consteval`?"
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Do we want to add .view()?" !!! question "POLL: Do we want to add `.view()`?"
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Do we want the .size member to be an integral_constant<size_t, N> (and .empty to be bool_constant<N==0>)?" !!! question "POLL: Do we want the `.size` member to be an `integral_constant<size_t, N>` (and `.empty` to be `bool_constant<N==0>`)?"
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Should the index operator[] return a reference to const?" !!! question "POLL: Should the index `operator[]` return a reference to `const`?"
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal have a precondition that txt[N] == 0?" !!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal have a precondition that `txt[N] == 0`?"
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|