From 2f1e45abbda316415a9de3a65cce72dd3b76c069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mateusz Pusz Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 17:41:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Kona 2023 report updated --- docs/blog/posts/kona-2023-report.md | 22 ++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/kona-2023-report.md b/docs/blog/posts/kona-2023-report.md index adfbec5e..fdb9ecd8 100644 --- a/docs/blog/posts/kona-2023-report.md +++ b/docs/blog/posts/kona-2023-report.md @@ -13,15 +13,15 @@ proposal in Belfast 2019 and Prague 2020. All those groups expressed interest in standardization of such a library and encouraged further work. The authors also got valuable initial feedback that highly influenced the design of the V2 version of the mp-units library.** -In the following years, we scoped on getting more feedback from the production and design and -developed version 2 of the **mp-units** library that resolves many issues raised by the users and -Committee members. The features and interfaces of this version are close to being the best we can -get with the current version of the C++ language standard. +In the following years, we scoped on getting more feedback from the production and design. This +resulted in version 2 of the **mp-units** library that resolved many issues the users and Committee +members raised. The features and interfaces of this version are close to being the best we can get +with the current version of the C++ language standard. -For the last ISO C++ Committee meeting, we provided three new proposals related to the -standardization of the quantities and units library: +We submitted three new proposals related to the standardization of the quantities and units library +for the last ISO C++ Committee meeting: - [P2980: A motivation, scope, and plan for a physical quantities and units library](https://wg21.link/p2980R1), - [P2981: Improving our safety with a physical quantities and units library](https://wg21.link/p2981R1), @@ -31,11 +31,13 @@ Those were reviewed and briefly discussed in several groups: Numerics (SG6), Saf (SG23), and Library Evolution Working Group (LEWG). Most of the feedback was positive, and the Committee is interested in spending more time on such proposals. +The following poll was taken by the LEWG: + !!! question "LEWG POLL: Given that our time is limited, more time should be promised for a quantities and units library" - | SF | F | N | A | SA | - |----|----|---|---|----| - | 10 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | + | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | + |-------------------|----------|---------|---------|------------------| + | 10 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Attendance: 22 + 6 @@ -46,5 +48,5 @@ the Committee is interested in spending more time on such proposals. Outcome: Strong consensus in favor Additionally, some concerns were raised about the large scope of the proposal. We were encouraged -to come back with more details and design rationale in a unified paper. This is what we are working +to return with more details and design rationale in a unified paper. This is what we are working on now for the next Committee meeting that will happen in mid-March 2024 in Tokyo.