mpusz/mp-units
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/mpusz/mp-units.git synced 2025-07-30 18:37:15 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: broken links to ISO 80000 fixed

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mateusz Pusz
2023-11-29 14:13:15 +01:00
parent 683c49bef3
commit e689f6e582
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/users_guide/framework_basics/design_overview.md
View File

@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ results in the `derived_dimension<isq::dim_length, per<isq::dim_time>>` type.
## Quantity character ## Quantity character
[ISO 80000](../appendix/references.md#ISO80000) explicitly states that quantities (even of the same kind) may have [ISO 80000](../../appendix/references.md#ISO80000) explicitly states that quantities (even of the same kind) may have
different [characters](../../appendix/glossary.md#character): different [characters](../../appendix/glossary.md#character):
- scalar, - scalar,
@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ enum class quantity_character { scalar, vector, tensor };
## Quantity specification ## Quantity specification
[Dimension is not enough to describe a quantity](systems_of_quantities.md#dimension-is-not-enough-to-describe-a-quantity). [Dimension is not enough to describe a quantity](systems_of_quantities.md#dimension-is-not-enough-to-describe-a-quantity).
This is why the [ISO 80000](../appendix/references.md#ISO80000) provides hundreds of named quantity This is why the [ISO 80000](../../appendix/references.md#ISO80000) provides hundreds of named quantity
types. It turns out that there are many more quantity types in the [ISQ](../../appendix/glossary.md#isq) types. It turns out that there are many more quantity types in the [ISQ](../../appendix/glossary.md#isq)
than the named units in the [SI](../../appendix/glossary.md#si). than the named units in the [SI](../../appendix/glossary.md#si).
@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ This is why the **mp-units** library introduces a quantity specification entity
We know that it might be sometimes confusing to talk about quantities, quantity types/names, and quantity We know that it might be sometimes confusing to talk about quantities, quantity types/names, and quantity
specifications. However, it might be important to notice here that even the specifications. However, it might be important to notice here that even the
[ISO 80000](../appendix/references.md#ISO80000) admits that: [ISO 80000](../../appendix/references.md#ISO80000) admits that:
> It is customary to use the same term, "quantity", to refer to both general quantities, such as length, > It is customary to use the same term, "quantity", to refer to both general quantities, such as length,
> mass, etc., and their instances, such as given lengths, given masses, etc. Accordingly, we are used to > mass, etc., and their instances, such as given lengths, given masses, etc. Accordingly, we are used to