mpusz/mp-units
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/mpusz/mp-units.git synced 2025-07-31 19:04:27 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

style: whitespaces fixed again

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mateusz Pusz
2024-04-19 18:27:41 +01:00
parent 9525a4b25b
commit eb6e331de7
1 changed files with 24 additions and 24 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

48
docs/blog/posts/tokyo-2024-report.md
View File

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
--- ---
date: 2024-04-15 date: 2024-04-15
authors: authors:
 - mpusz - mpusz
categories: categories:
 - WG21 - WG21
--- ---
# Report from the Tokyo 2024 ISO C++ Committee meeting # Report from the Tokyo 2024 ISO C++ Committee meeting
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ We run a few polls in SG6 as well:
!!! question "POLL: The syntax `number * unit` is the right solution for constructing quantities. Not allowing reordering the operands is correct." !!! question "POLL: The syntax `number * unit` is the right solution for constructing quantities. Not allowing reordering the operands is correct."
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
!!! question "POLL: Not defining any UDLs is the right solution." !!! question "POLL: Not defining any UDLs is the right solution."
  No objection to unanimous consent. No objection to unanimous consent.
The paper was also briefly discussed in SG18 LEWG Incubator, and the initial feedback was also The paper was also briefly discussed in SG18 LEWG Incubator, and the initial feedback was also
positive. No polls were taken. positive. No polls were taken.
@@ -50,36 +50,36 @@ Plenty of polls were taken:
!!! question "POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing std::basic_fixed_string, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work." !!! question "POLL: We should promise more committee time to pursuing std::basic_fixed_string, knowing that our time is scarce and this will leave less time for other work."
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal be consteval?" !!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal be consteval?"
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Do we want to add .view()?" !!! question "POLL: Do we want to add .view()?"
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Do we want the .size member to be an integral_constant<size_t, N> (and .empty to be bool_constant<N==0>)?" !!! question "POLL: Do we want the .size member to be an integral_constant<size_t, N> (and .empty to be bool_constant<N==0>)?"
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Should the index operator[] return a reference to const?" !!! question "POLL: Should the index operator[] return a reference to const?"
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
!!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal have a precondition that txt[N] == 0?" !!! question "POLL: Should the constructor from a string literal have a precondition that txt[N] == 0?"
  | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against | | Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
  |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:| |:-----------------:|:--------:|:-------:|:-------:|:----------------:|
  | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |