Better guarding for LMS SHA256_256 vs LMS SHA256_192

This commit is contained in:
Anthony Hu
2025-01-10 17:24:05 -05:00
parent 21bdb76ede
commit 4ca65f0ce7

View File

@ -351,7 +351,9 @@ static const wc_LmsParamsMap wc_lms_map[] = {
LMS_PARAMS(1, 10, 8, 3, LMS_SHA256_M24_H10, LMOTS_SHA256_N24_W8,
WC_SHA256_192_DIGEST_SIZE) },
#endif
#endif /* WOLFSSL_LMS_SHA256_192 */
#if LMS_MAX_HEIGHT >= 20
#ifndef WOLFSSL_NO_LMS_SHA256_256
{ WC_LMS_PARM_L1_H20_W2 , "LMS/HSS_SHA256/192_L1_H20_W2",
LMS_PARAMS(1, 20, 2, 1, LMS_SHA256_M32_H20, LMOTS_SHA256_N32_W2,
WC_SHA256_192_DIGEST_SIZE) },
@ -362,7 +364,7 @@ static const wc_LmsParamsMap wc_lms_map[] = {
LMS_PARAMS(1, 20, 8, 3, LMS_SHA256_M32_H20, LMOTS_SHA256_N32_W8,
WC_SHA256_192_DIGEST_SIZE) },
#endif
#endif /* WOLFSSL_LMS_SHA256_192 */
#endif
};
/* Number of parameter sets supported. */
#define WC_LMS_MAP_LEN ((int)(sizeof(wc_lms_map) / sizeof(*wc_lms_map)))