fixed some links, added Beman's name as review manager

[SVN r8418]

bibliography.htm

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ A. A. Stepanov and M. Lee
 <TABLE>
 <TR valign=top>
 <TD nowrap>Copyright &copy 2000</TD><TD>
-<A HREF=http://www.boost.org/people/jeremy_siek.htm>Jeremy Siek</A>, Univ.of Notre Dame (<A HREF="mailto:jsiek@lsc.nd.edu">jsiek@lsc.nd.edu</A>)
+<A HREF="../../people/jeremy_siek.htm">Jeremy Siek</A>, Univ.of Notre Dame (<A HREF="mailto:jsiek@lsc.nd.edu">jsiek@lsc.nd.edu</A>)
 </TD></TR></TABLE>
 
 </BODY>

concept_check.htm

@@ -19,12 +19,14 @@
 
 <BR Clear>
 
-<H1>
+<H1>The Boost Concept Checking Library (BCCL)</H1>
+
+<h2>
 <A NAME="sec:concept-checking"></A>
 header <a href="../../boost/concept_check.hpp">
 <tt>boost/concept_check.hpp</tt></a> and <a href="../../boost/concept_archetype.hpp">
 <tt>boost/concept_archetype.hpp</tt></a>
-</H1>
+</h2>
 
 <p>
 Generic programming in C++ is characterized by the use of template
@@ -34,7 +36,7 @@ explicitly handling concepts.  As a result, it can be difficult to
 insure that a concrete type meets the requirements of the concept it
 is supposed to represent.  Error messages resulting from incorrect use
 of a concrete type can be particularly difficult to decipher.  The
-Boost Concept Checking Library (BCCL) provides mechanisms for checking
+Boost Concept Checking Library provides mechanisms for checking
 parameters in C++ template libraries.  The mechanisms use standard C++
 and introduce no run-time overhead. The main cost of using the
 mechanism is in compile-time.
@@ -56,8 +58,9 @@ The documentation is organized into the following sections.
 </OL>
 
 <p>
-<a href="http://www.boost.org/people/jeremy_siek.htm">Jeremy Siek</a>
-contributed this library. X managed the formal review.
+<a href="../../people/jeremy_siek.htm">Jeremy Siek</a> contributed
+this library. <a href="../../people/beman_dawes.html">Beman Dawes</a>
+managed the formal review.
 
 <h2><a name="introduction">Introduction</a></h2>