concept_checks.hpp -> concept_check.hpp

[SVN r8414]

class_concept_check_fail_expected.cpp

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 // "as is" without express or implied warranty, and with no claim as
 // to its suitability for any purpose.
 
-#include <boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_check.hpp>
 
 /*
 

class_concept_check_test.cpp

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 // "as is" without express or implied warranty, and with no claim as
 // to its suitability for any purpose.
 
-#include <boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_check.hpp>
 
 /*
 

concept_check.htm

@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
 
 <H1>
 <A NAME="sec:concept-checking"></A>
-header <a href="../../boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp">
-<tt>boost/concept_checks.hpp</tt></a> and <a href="../../boost/pending/concept_archetypes.hpp">
-<tt>boost/concept_archetypes.hpp</tt></a>
+header <a href="../../boost/pending/concept_check.hpp">
+<tt>boost/concept_check.hpp</tt></a> and <a href="../../boost/pending/concept_archetype.hpp">
+<tt>boost/concept_archetype.hpp</tt></a>
 </H1>
 
 <p>
@@ -183,14 +183,14 @@ informative message (and is in fact what the Boost Concept Checking
 Library produces):
 
 <pre>
-concept_checks.hpp: In method `void LessThanComparable_concept
+concept_check.hpp: In method `void LessThanComparable_concept
   &lt;_List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *> >::constraints()':
-concept_checks.hpp:334:   instantiated from `RandomAccessIterator_concept
+concept_check.hpp:334:   instantiated from `RandomAccessIterator_concept
   &lt;_List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *> >::constraints()'
 bad_error_eg.cpp:9:   instantiated from `stable_sort&lt;_List_iterator
   &lt;foo,foo &,foo *> >(_List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *>, 
   _List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *>)'
-concept_checks.hpp:209: no match for `_List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *> &
+concept_check.hpp:209: no match for `_List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *> &
   &lt; _List_iterator&lt;foo,foo &,foo *> &'
 </pre>
 
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ href="http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/RandomAccessIterator.html">
 RandomAccessIterator</a>).
 <LI> The error message is now much shorter and does not reveal
   internal STL functions.
-<LI> The presence of <tt>concept_checks.hpp</tt> and
+<LI> The presence of <tt>concept_check.hpp</tt> and
   <tt>constraints()</tt> in the error message alerts the user to the
   fact that the error lies in the user code and not in the library
   implementation.

concept_check_fail_expected.cpp

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 // "as is" without express or implied warranty, and with no claim as
 // to its suitability for any purpose.
 
-#include <boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_check.hpp>
 
 /*
 

concept_check_test.cpp

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 // "as is" without express or implied warranty, and with no claim as
 // to its suitability for any purpose.
 
-#include <boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp>
-#include <boost/pending/concept_archetypes.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_check.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_archetype.hpp>
 
 /*
 

stl_concept_check.cpp

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 // see as much of this file compile as possible.
 //
 
-#include <boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_check.hpp>
 
 #include <iterator>
 #include <set>

stl_concept_covering.cpp

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 // "as is" without express or implied warranty, and with no claim as
 // to its suitability for any purpose.
 
-#include <boost/pending/concept_checks.hpp>
-#include <boost/pending/concept_archetypes.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_check.hpp>
+#include <boost/pending/concept_archetype.hpp>
 #include <algorithm>
 #include <numeric>
 

using_concept_check.htm

@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ gives and example of applying the concept checks to STL
 containers. The file is listed here:
 
 <pre>
-  #include &lt;boost/concept_checks.hpp&gt;
+  #include &lt;boost/concept_check.hpp&gt;
 
   #include &lt;iterator&gt;
   #include &lt;set&gt;