boostorg/config
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/config.git synced 2025-07-30 04:17:16 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added value-initialization test to try to reproduce http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111

Browse Source 
[SVN r61196]
This commit is contained in:
Niels Dekker
2010-04-11 12:33:56 +00:00
parent bb8216ed39
commit b124875c50
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp
View File

@ -301,7 +301,11 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
// of an empty set of parentheses, and allows checking whether
// each of them is indeed value-initialized, as specified by
// the C++ Standard ([dcl.init]).
class value_initializer
//
// Note: its base class, int_struct, is there to try to reproduce GCC Bug 30111,
// "Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members",
// reported by Jonathan Wakely: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111
class value_initializer: int_struct
{
private:
enum_holder m_enum_holder;
@ -360,6 +364,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
public:
value_initializer()
:
int_struct(),
m_enum_holder(),
m_enum_holder_array(),
m_enum(),
@ -419,6 +424,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
unsigned check() const
{
const unsigned num_failures =
(IS_VALUE_INITIALIZED(data) ? 0 : 1) +
(IS_VALUE_INITIALIZED(m_enum_holder) ? 0 : 1) +
(IS_VALUE_INITIALIZED(m_enum_holder_array[0]) ? 0 : 1) +
(IS_VALUE_INITIALIZED(m_enum_holder_array[1]) ? 0 : 1) +
@ -525,7 +531,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
{
std::cout << "Number of initialization failures on the stack: " << num_failures_on_stack
<< "\nNumber of initialization failures on the heap: " << num_failures_on_heap
<< "\nDetected by boost_no_complete_value_initialization::test() revision 8."
<< "\nDetected by boost_no_complete_value_initialization::test() revision 9."
<< std::endl;
}
return static_cast<int>(num_failures_on_stack + num_failures_on_heap);