Copy-editing optional documentation. Fixes #5382 and a few other issues I noticed while I was at it.

[SVN r71052]

Conflicts:
	doc/html/boost_optional/detailed_semantics.html
	doc/html/index.html
This commit is contained in:
Andrzej Krzemienski
2014-04-11 12:40:07 +02:00
parent fdbac34bfb
commit c5ca90ed58
3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
[/
[/
Boost.Optional
Copyright (c) 2003-2007 Fernando Luis Cacciola Carballal
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ The observation made in the last paragraph about the irrelevant nature of the
additional `nil_t` with respect to [_purpose] of `optional<T>` suggests an
alternative model: a ['container] that either has a value of `T` or nothing.
As of this writing I don't know of any precedence for a variable-size
As of this writing I don't know of any precedent for a variable-size
fixed-capacity (of 1) stack-based container model for optional values, yet I
believe this is the consequence of the lack of practical implementations of
such a container rather than an inherent shortcoming of the container model.
@ -176,14 +176,14 @@ untitialized optional objects: The operators * and ->]
A relevant feature of a pointer is that it can have a [*null pointer value].
This is a ['special] value which is used to indicate that the pointer is not
referring to any object at all. In other words, null pointer values convey
the notion of inexistent objects.
the notion of nonexistent objects.
This meaning of the null pointer value allowed pointers to became a ['de
facto] standard for handling optional objects because all you have to do
to refer to a value which you don't really have is to use a null pointer
value of the appropriate type. Pointers have been used for decades—from
the days of C APIs to modern C++ libraries—to ['refer] to optional (that is,
possibly inexistent) objects; particularly as optional arguments to a
possibly nonexistent) objects; particularly as optional arguments to a
function, but also quite often as optional data members.
The possible presence of a null pointer value makes the operations that

View File

@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ functions could have the following interface:
std::pair<char,bool> get_async_input();
std::pair<point,bool> polygon::get_any_point_effectively_inside();
These functions use a consistent interface for dealing with possibly inexistent
These functions use a consistent interface for dealing with possibly nonexistent
results:
std::pair<point,bool> p = poly.get_any_point_effectively_inside();

View File

@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ __SPACE__
* otherwise, same as:
[: `optional<T ['(not a ref)]>::optional()`]
[: `optional<T `['(not a ref)]`>::optional()`]
[: `optional<T&> ::optional()`]
__SPACE__
@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ from the factory `f` (i.e., the value [_is not copied]).
* [*Notes:] See [link boost_optional.in_place_factories In-Place Factories]
* [*Exception Safety:] Exceptions can only be thrown during the call to
the `T` constructor used by the factory; in that case, the `optional` object
will be left empty.
will be reset to be ['uninitialized].
__SPACE__