boostorg/unordered
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/unordered.git synced 2025-07-29 19:07:15 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Adjust order of variables to see if intel failure changes.

Browse Source 
So currently on one intel tester find_tests is failing the 'pos !=
x.end()' test, but not the 'const_pos != x_const.end()' test for
unordered_set (and possibly others, the test results are truncated). I'm
a bit stumped as to why this should be, as for unordered_set the const
and non-const versions are basically the exact same code. See if
changing the order makes any difference to what fails.
This commit is contained in:
Daniel James
2016-10-05 00:57:58 +01:00
parent dadb4486ee
commit 982685d3a0
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
test/unordered/find_tests.cpp
View File

@ -37,15 +37,15 @@ void find_tests1(X*, test::random_generator generator)
tracker.begin(); it1 != tracker.end(); ++it1)
{
BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME X::key_type key = test::get_key<X>(*it1);
iterator pos = x.find(key);
BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME X::const_iterator
const_pos = x_const.find(key);
BOOST_TEST(pos != x.end());
BOOST_TEST(pos != x.end() &&
x.key_eq()(key, test::get_key<X>(*pos)));
iterator pos = x.find(key);
BOOST_TEST(const_pos != x_const.end());
BOOST_TEST(const_pos != x_const.end() &&
x_const.key_eq()(key, test::get_key<X>(*const_pos)));
BOOST_TEST(pos != x.end());
BOOST_TEST(pos != x.end() &&
x.key_eq()(key, test::get_key<X>(*pos)));
BOOST_TEST(x.count(key) == tracker.count(key));