boostorg/unordered
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/unordered.git synced 2025-08-01 04:14:29 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove the note about issue 560, as it has been marked NAD (not a defect).

Browse Source 
[SVN r4147]
This commit is contained in:
Daniel James
2007-05-20 17:40:15 +00:00
parent ef2f5116dd
commit b3df9afd7a
1 changed files with 0 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
doc/rationale.qbk
View File

@@ -133,10 +133,4 @@ The proposed resolution is to add a new subsection to 17.4.4:
[:An implementation shall not supply an overloaded function signature specified in any library clause if such a signature would be inherently ambiguous during overload resolution due to two library types referring to the same type.] [:An implementation shall not supply an overloaded function signature specified in any library clause if such a signature would be inherently ambiguous during overload resolution due to two library types referring to the same type.]
So I don't supply the `iterator` overloads. So I don't supply the `iterator` overloads.
[h3 [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#560
560. User-defined allocators without default constructor]]
This implementation should work okay for an allocator without a default
constructor, although I don't currently test for this.
[endsect] [endsect]