forked from catchorg/Catch2
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			60 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			60 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
<a id="top"></a>
 | 
						|
# Why do we need yet another C++ test framework?
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Good question. For C++ there are quite a number of established frameworks,
 | 
						|
including (but not limited to),
 | 
						|
[Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/),
 | 
						|
[Boost.Test](http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html),
 | 
						|
[CppUnit](http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/cppunit/index.php?title=Main_Page),
 | 
						|
[Cute](http://www.cute-test.com), and
 | 
						|
[many, many more](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
So what does Catch2 bring to the party that differentiates it from these? Apart from the catchy name, of course.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
## Key Features
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Quick and easy to get started. Just download two files, add them into your project and you're away.
 | 
						|
* No external dependencies. As long as you can compile C++14 and have the C++ standard library available.
 | 
						|
* Write test cases as, self-registering, functions (or methods, if you prefer).
 | 
						|
* Divide test cases into sections, each of which is run in isolation (eliminates the need for fixtures).
 | 
						|
* Use BDD-style Given-When-Then sections as well as traditional unit test cases.
 | 
						|
* Only one core assertion macro for comparisons. Standard C/C++ operators are used for the comparison - yet the full expression is decomposed and lhs and rhs values are logged.
 | 
						|
* Tests are named using free-form strings - no more couching names in legal identifiers.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
## Other core features
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Tests can be tagged for easily running ad-hoc groups of tests.
 | 
						|
* Failures can (optionally) break into the debugger on common platforms.
 | 
						|
* Output is through modular reporter objects. Basic textual and XML reporters are included. Custom reporters can easily be added.
 | 
						|
* JUnit xml output is supported for integration with third-party tools, such as CI servers.
 | 
						|
* A default main() function is provided, but you can supply your own for complete control (e.g. integration into your own test runner GUI).
 | 
						|
* A command line parser is provided and can still be used if you choose to provided your own main() function.
 | 
						|
* Alternative assertion macro(s) report failures but don't abort the test case
 | 
						|
* Good set of facilities for floating point comparisons (`Catch::Approx` and full set of matchers)
 | 
						|
* Internal and friendly macros are isolated so name clashes can be managed
 | 
						|
* Data generators (data driven test support)
 | 
						|
* Hamcrest-style Matchers for testing complex properties
 | 
						|
* Microbenchmarking support
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
## Who else is using Catch2?
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A whole lot of people. According to the 2021 Jetbrains C++ ecosystem survey,
 | 
						|
about 11% of C++ programmers use Catch2 for unit testing, making it the
 | 
						|
second most popular unit testing framework.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
You can also take a look at the (incomplete) list of [open source projects](opensource-users.md#top)
 | 
						|
or the (very incomplete) list of [commercial users of Catch2](commercial-users.md#top)
 | 
						|
for some idea on who else also uses Catch2.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
---
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
See the [tutorial](tutorial.md#top) to get more of a taste of using
 | 
						|
Catch2 in practice.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
---
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
[Home](Readme.md#top)
 |