Remove BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENT

This makes boost::config independent of boost::core in the
modularized repos.

(from Stephen Kelly)

Daniel James: The original patch included changes for several libraries.
I'll deal with them later, they shouldn't break since the changes were to
remove code that won't be activated any more.

[SVN r85274]
This commit is contained in:
Daniel James
2013-08-10 12:42:47 +00:00
parent ffee60eade
commit 330ac02c14
3 changed files with 1 additions and 87 deletions

View File

@ -392,24 +392,6 @@
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>
<code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS</span></code>
</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>
Compiler
</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>
Can only use deduced template arguments when calling function template
instantiations.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>
<code class="computeroutput"><span class="identifier">BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING</span></code>

View File

@ -105,10 +105,6 @@ indeed doing so may be impossible in some cases. Those libraries that do
honor this will typically abort if a critical error occurs - you have been
warned!
]]
[[`BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS`][Compiler][
Can only use deduced template arguments when calling function template
instantiations.
]]
[[`BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING`][Compiler][
The compiler does not perform function template ordering or its function
template ordering is incorrect.

View File

@ -503,69 +503,8 @@ namespace boost{
#endif
// BOOST_[APPEND_]EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_[NON_]TYPE macros --------------------------//
//
// Some compilers have problems with function templates whose template
// parameters don't appear in the function parameter list (basically
// they just link one instantiation of the template in the final
// executable). These macros provide a uniform way to cope with the
// problem with no effects on the calling syntax.
// Example:
//
// #include <iostream>
// #include <ostream>
// #include <typeinfo>
//
// template <int n>
// void f() { std::cout << n << ' '; }
//
// template <typename T>
// void g() { std::cout << typeid(T).name() << ' '; }
//
// int main() {
// f<1>();
// f<2>();
//
// g<int>();
// g<double>();
// }
//
// With VC++ 6.0 the output is:
//
// 2 2 double double
//
// To fix it, write
//
// template <int n>
// void f(BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE(int, n)) { ... }
//
// template <typename T>
// void g(BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(T)) { ... }
//
#if defined(BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS) && defined(__cplusplus)
# include "boost/type.hpp"
# include "boost/non_type.hpp"
# define BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(t) boost::type<t>* = 0
# define BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE_SPEC(t) boost::type<t>*
# define BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE(t, v) boost::non_type<t, v>* = 0
# define BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE_SPEC(t, v) boost::non_type<t, v>*
# define BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(t) \
, BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(t)
# define BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE_SPEC(t) \
, BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE_SPEC(t)
# define BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE(t, v) \
, BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE(t, v)
# define BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE_SPEC(t, v) \
, BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE_SPEC(t, v)
#else
// no workaround needed: expand to nothing
// These macros are obsolete. Port away and remove.
# define BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(t)
# define BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE_SPEC(t)
@ -577,9 +516,6 @@ namespace boost{
# define BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE(t, v)
# define BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE_SPEC(t, v)
#endif // defined BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS
// When BOOST_NO_STD_TYPEINFO is defined, we can just import
// the global definition into std namespace:
#if defined(BOOST_NO_STD_TYPEINFO) && defined(__cplusplus)