feedc0de/boost_conversion
1
0
Fork 0
forked from boostorg/conversion
Code Pull Requests Activity

Fix FAQ section of lexical_cast documentation (refs #7582)

Browse Source 
[SVN r81069]
This commit is contained in:
Antony Polukhin
2012-10-27 16:30:41 +00:00
parent 42e7585dd4
commit c484325310
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/lexical_cast.qbk
View File

@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ It breaks my `operator>>` that works only in presence of this flag. Can you remo
* [*Answer:] May be in a future version. There is no requirement in * [*Answer:] May be in a future version. There is no requirement in
__proposallong__ to reset the flag but __proposallong__ to reset the flag but
remember that __proposalshort__ is not yet accepted by the committee. By the way, it's a great opportunity to remember that __proposalshort__ is not yet accepted by the committee. By the way, it's a great opportunity to
make your `operator>>` conform to the standard. make your `operator>>` more general.
Read a good C++ book, study `std::sentry` and [@boost:libs/io/doc/ios_state.html `ios_state_saver`]. Read a good C++ book, study `std::sentry` and [@boost:libs/io/doc/ios_state.html `ios_state_saver`].
[pre [pre