Tweak the "Why are only big and little native endianness supported?" FAQ entry wording.

This commit is contained in:
Beman
2015-10-16 10:43:45 -04:00
parent f14f080359
commit 484c635316

View File

@ -439,8 +439,9 @@ gives more pros and cons.</p>
and the other middle endian approaches are interesting historical curiosities
but have no relevance to today&#39;s C++ developers. The
<a href="conversion.html#native-order-specification">specification for native
ordering</a> is carefully crafted to allow implementations to support other
orderings, thanks to Howard Hinnant. </p>
ordering</a> has been carefully crafted to allow support for other
orderings in the future, should the need arise. Thanks to Howard Hinnant for
suggesting draft standarese. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Why do both the buffer and arithmetic types exist?</b></p>
@ -609,7 +610,7 @@ Blechmann, Tim Moore, tymofey, Tomas Puverle, Vincente Botet, Yuval Ronen and
Vitaly Budovsk. Apologies if anyone has been missed.</p>
<hr>
<p>Last revised:
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" s-type="EDITED" s-format="%d %B, %Y" startspan -->14 October, 2015<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="38874" --></p>
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" s-type="EDITED" s-format="%d %B, %Y" startspan -->16 October, 2015<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="38878" --></p>
<p>© Copyright Beman Dawes, 2011, 2013</p>
<p>Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. See
<a href="http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt">www.boost.org/ LICENSE_1_0.txt</a></p>