feedc0de/boost_unordered
1
0
Fork 0
forked from boostorg/unordered
Code Pull Requests Activity

Don't test inserting from initializer list in old clang

Browse Source 
There's a problem with it causing an ambiguous overload. I don't think
there's anything we can do to fix that, so just don't test it.

There's another bug where a std::pair doesn't get correctly constructed
from an rvalue when using Clang 3.1 in C++11 mode. But I can't see any
way to easily fix that, and it's a pretty old compiler now.
This commit is contained in:
Daniel James
2017-04-08 06:17:43 +01:00
parent c18f57f62b
commit c2d2be021a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
test/unordered/compile_tests.hpp
View File

@ -638,7 +638,9 @@ void unordered_copyable_test(X& x, Key& k, T& t, Hash& hf, Pred& eq)
a.insert(list);
a.insert({t, t, t});
#if !BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_MSVC, < 1900)
#if !BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_MSVC, < 1900) && \
(!defined(__clang__) || __clang_major__ >= 4 || \
(__clang_major__ == 3 && __clang_minor__ >= 4))
a.insert({});
a.insert({t});
a.insert({t, t});