Two new keys are added to ObjectBucketClaim.spec.additionalConfig to
support the configuration of bucket scope quota(s). This differs from
the existing maxObjects & maxSize keys, which manage a user scope
quota(s) on the automatically generated rgw user.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Hoblitt <josh@hoblitt.com>
Given that Ceph Quincy (v17) is past end of life,
remove Quincy from the supported Ceph versions,
examples, and documentation.
Supported versions now include only Reef and Squid.
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
For the specification see:
<https://github.com/rook/rook/blob/master/design/ceph/object/swift-and-keystone-integration.md>
* extend the API object specs for swift and keystone integration
* adapt rgw to the new go-ceph version
- The parameter lists of the API call have changes, as parameters
ignored by the RGW Admin Ops API are no longer serialized, therefore
the mock has to be adapted.
- There is now validation for the user keys that are passed to the
User get API, therefore things failed when we had empty keys in our
User proxy object.
* expand the reconcile loop for the swift and keystone integration
* fix minor mistakes in design document
* add env var to pass extra args to minikube
Minikube decides CPU cores and memory automatically based on the
available resources on the machine which may be insufficient to
run rook. This commit adds an environment variable to add arbitrary
arguments to the minikube command, so both can be specified if
desired.
* integration tests for swift and keystone
The new integration of swift or s3 and keystone support by rook
does not have any integration tests yet.
This commit introduces integration tests for swift and keystone. The
tests are done against a minimal keystone setup (keystone container
image from Yaook-project (https://yaook.cloud), sqlite as database
backend, cert-manager and trust-manager for test certificate setup).
To prevent hardcoded credentials, passwords are generated
by the tests. The integration tests use the openstack client
(keystone- and swift-functionality) (https://docs.openstack.org/
python-openstackclient/ latest/). This was a concious design decision
to use client tooling as close as possible to the end user instead of
using other go-libraries (such as gophercloud).
* add documentation on swift and keystone
Currently there is no documentation on the use of Swift to access
an object store as well as the use of OpenStack keystone for
authentication.
This commit adds documentation on the use of Swift and OpenStack
keystone, as well as CRD-related documentation and an example setup.
* add integration tests for S3 via keystone
This commit introduces integration tests for s3 and keystone. The
tests are run against the same minimal keystone setup that the tests
for swift and keystone use.
The integration tests use the aws s3 client to use client tooling as
close as possible to the end user instead of using other go-libraries.
Co-authored-by: Jan Klippel <jan.klippel@uhurutec.com>
Co-authored-by: Silvio Ankermann <silvio.ankermann@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Riese <sebastian.riese@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Klippel <jan.klippel@uhurutec.com>
Signed-off-by: Silvio Ankermann <silvio.ankermann@cloudandheat.com>
RGW can only serve a single certificate. This limitation means that the
prior behavior of using the default service for admin ops when TLS is
enabled may mean it requires additional complex certificate management
to make sure the object store uses a certificate valid for Rook internal
admin ops and user connections.
This is needlessly complex for users. Instead, change Rook's behavior
and documentation to clarify that it will use the same endpoint intended
for S3 client applications. This means that users have a more
straightforward path to enabling both Rook and consuming applications.
More info: https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/14530
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
Add CephObjectStore spec.hosting.advertiseEndpoint configuration. This
provides a clear documented default for which endpoint Rook "advertises"
to dependent resources like CephObjectStores, OBCs, and COSI
Buckets/Accesses and allows users to override the default behavior if
desired.
The current default is to round-robin an endpoint from
spec.hosting.dnsNames, which has proven to be troublesome for some
users' object store configurations. This change provides much-needed
disambiguation for users.
This may be a breaking change for some existing spec.hosting.dnsNames
users. This is unexpected but is documented.
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
mkdocs uses a markdown renderer that is hardcoded to 4 spaces per tab
for detecting indentation levels, including ordered- and
unordered-lists. Since we cannot easily change the renderer, begin using
a markdown linter in CI that will fail if official docs do not adhere to
the spacing rules.
As a starting point, the markdownlint config does not begin with the
default set of checks, which might overwhelm attempts to fix them.
Instead, focus on list-tab-spacing rules and a few other highly useful
checks.
markdownlint also has some gaps in its abilities that allow common Rook
doc issues to pass acceptance. However, it allows creating custom
linting plugins. Create 2 such linting plugins to check 2 things:
- all doc lines (except code blocks) must be aligned to a 4-space
boundary, without exception. This ensures that markdown will render
correctly with mkdocs. This unfortunately makes it possible to create
lists that are internally aligned strangely.
- admonitions must all follow the same format of
```
!!! header
body
```
For the strange lists, this is allowed and renders correctly, but it
looks strange:
```md
- first bullet
- second bullet
still second bullet
- third bullet
has a paragraph
of text inside
- last bullet
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
The description of the object store types was improperly
formatted due to a missing newline before the bullet points.
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Until now, an object store would create all the necessary
metadata pools and the data pool that were exclusively
for its own object store. When isolation between object
stores is necessary, this would cause many pools and
PGs to be created in the cluster, which was not
manageable.
Now one set of pools can be created to be shared
by any number of object stores. The metadata and data
between each object store is isolated by
RADOS namespaces, which by design will keep the
data safe for multi-tenancy.
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
add an option to set prefix for the name of obc provisioner instead of
ceph cluster namespace.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Fixed a wording problem and moved the
app pod to default namespace where secret
was created and also removed the init container
from the sample as the busybox doesnt
have setup-aws-credentials CLI pre-installed.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
add a new toolbox yaml manifest which will use the
rook image instead of ceph image
for running s5 cmd container needs to run with rook image
closes: https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/12227
Signed-off-by: parth-gr <paarora@redhat.com>
Add steps for enabling the cosi driver that is disabled
by default. Also add an introduction to the COSI driver
and a section for prerequisites.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Adding CephCOSIDriver CRD and controller. The controller will bring up
the ceph cosi driver when first object store is created in the rook
operator namespace. Then admin can defined COSI CRDs like BucketClass
and BucketAccessClass for different object stores deployed via Rook.
Using the BucketClass and BucketAccessClass, user can define
BucketAccess for backend bucket in the RGW. The CephCOSIDriver CRD
defines configuration options for ceph cosi driver. In the first version
its usability is minimal. Even if it is not defined Rook will bring up
the ceph cosi driver with default values.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Some users want to deploy two CephObjectStores for a single Zone. The first
configures RGWs to process the synchronization of the data, while the second
CephObjectStore configures the client RGWs.
Currently, this can be implemented by setting the RGW option
'rgw_run_sync_thread' in the 'rook-config-override' ConfigMap, though it is not
really user friendly.
Ref: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/config-ref/#confval-rgw_run_sync_thread
This commit adds a new option in the CephObjectStore CRD as defined in issue
https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/12272. The new option
'disableMultisiteSyncTraffic' determine whether the operator should disable the
multisite sync threads for the RGWs.
If the option is set to 'false', or if the option is not specified, the operator
does nothing. This ensures that the multisite sync threads will not be enabled
for users that disabled explicitely the multisite sync threads either manually
or with the 'rook-config-override' ConfigMap.
This commit also recommends to use two objectstore when scaling Ceph Objectstore
Multisite replication, with one objectstore configured with disabled replication
traffic.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Henry <polyedre@disroot.org>
1) donot change rgw fqdn to ip if provided,
As now the bucket class supports the
entry of fqdn
2) update crds with new description in EndpointAddress
Signed-off-by: parth-gr <paarora@redhat.com>
The StorageConfiguration docs for external needs to update with Rook
design
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Bucket notifications and topics have been implemented since
v1.8 and have been stable. Therefore, with v1.11 we move
the feature to stable.
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
The name of the CRD is more clear for finding the CRD specs
instead of a modified form of the name that was intended
to be more human readable. When someone is looking for the
CRD settings, they more naturally expect the CRD name
in the title
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Remove the health checker for CephObjectStore. The liveness and
readiness probes go through the same code paths in RGW as creating
buckets without as much affect on the storage backend.
Full discussion: https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/11031
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@redhat.com>
Most of the users starts with single site, provide the steps to convert
existing cephobjectstore into multisite configurations.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com>
Blaine Gardner
Artem Torubarov
Joshua Hoblitt
Travis Nielsen
Artem Torubarov
Vamsi Krishna Sethu
Jiffin Tony Thottan
Madhu Rajanna
Redouane Kachach
parth-gr
Lucas Henry
xiaobaowen
Tarun Gupta Akirala
Blaine Gardner
Jiffin Tony Thottan
Alexander Trost
Josh Soref