Bj?rn Fahller 5143f9577a 'optional<T&>::and_then(F&& f) &&' calls f with lvalue reference ...

This makes sense. The 'optional' is an rvalue, but its contained type
remains an lvalue reference. I.e.

int i = 3;
optional<int&>{i}.and_then([](int& r){return optional<int&>{++r});

The optional r-value still refers to 'i', which is not an r-value.

2018-06-03 12:09:17 +02:00

..

assignment.cpp

More tests

2017-12-18 10:10:11 +00:00

bases.cpp

Fix warnings

2018-04-11 15:54:58 +01:00

catch.hpp

Upgrade to Catch 2

2017-11-03 14:19:44 +00:00

constexpr.cpp

C++11 fixes

2018-02-23 09:34:05 +00:00

constructors.cpp

Get references compiling, initial tests

2017-12-14 14:53:35 +00:00

extensions.cpp

'optional<T&>::and_then(F&& f) &&' calls f with lvalue reference

2018-06-03 12:09:17 +02:00

hash.cpp

More tests

2017-10-02 10:38:05 +01:00

in_place.cpp

More tests

2017-10-02 10:06:58 +01:00

main.cpp

Start committing tests

2017-10-02 08:57:11 +01:00

make_optional.cpp

More tests

2017-12-18 09:56:36 +00:00

noexcept.cpp

Fix warnings

2018-04-11 15:54:58 +01:00

nullopt.cpp

Nullopt tests

2017-10-02 09:22:54 +01:00

observers.cpp

Support GCC 4.8

2017-10-21 22:31:42 +01:00

relops.cpp

More tests

2017-10-02 10:06:58 +01:00