mpusz/mp-units
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/mpusz/mp-units.git synced 2025-08-03 12:24:26 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: Kona 2023 report updated

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mateusz Pusz
2023-12-17 17:41:42 +01:00
parent 2a3341df7d
commit 2f1e45abbd
1 changed files with 12 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
docs/blog/posts/kona-2023-report.md
View File

@@ -13,15 +13,15 @@ proposal in Belfast 2019 and Prague 2020. All those groups expressed interest in
standardization of such a library and encouraged further work. The authors also got valuable
initial feedback that highly influenced the design of the V2 version of the mp-units library.**
In the following years, we scoped on getting more feedback from the production and design and
developed version 2 of the **mp-units** library that resolves many issues raised by the users and
Committee members. The features and interfaces of this version are close to being the best we can
get with the current version of the C++ language standard.
In the following years, we scoped on getting more feedback from the production and design. This
resulted in version 2 of the **mp-units** library that resolved many issues the users and Committee
members raised. The features and interfaces of this version are close to being the best we can get
with the current version of the C++ language standard.
<!-- more -->
For the last ISO C++ Committee meeting, we provided three new proposals related to the
standardization of the quantities and units library:
We submitted three new proposals related to the standardization of the quantities and units library
for the last ISO C++ Committee meeting:
- [P2980: A motivation, scope, and plan for a physical quantities and units library](https://wg21.link/p2980R1),
- [P2981: Improving our safety with a physical quantities and units library](https://wg21.link/p2981R1),
@@ -31,11 +31,13 @@ Those were reviewed and briefly discussed in several groups: Numerics (SG6), Saf
(SG23), and Library Evolution Working Group (LEWG). Most of the feedback was positive, and
the Committee is interested in spending more time on such proposals.
The following poll was taken by the LEWG:
!!! question "LEWG POLL: Given that our time is limited, more time should be promised for a quantities and units library"
| SF | F | N | A | SA |
|----|----|---|---|----|
| 10 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Strongly in Favor | In favor | Neutral | Against | Strongly Against |
|-------------------|----------|---------|---------|------------------|
| 10 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Attendance: 22 + 6
@@ -46,5 +48,5 @@ the Committee is interested in spending more time on such proposals.
Outcome: Strong consensus in favor
Additionally, some concerns were raised about the large scope of the proposal. We were encouraged
to come back with more details and design rationale in a unified paper. This is what we are working
to return with more details and design rationale in a unified paper. This is what we are working
on now for the next Committee meeting that will happen in mid-March 2024 in Tokyo.