boostorg/config
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/config.git synced 2025-07-30 04:17:16 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added more links to value-initialization bug reports: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/100744 and http://qc.embarcadero.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=51854

Browse Source 
[SVN r61197]
This commit is contained in:
Niels Dekker
2010-04-11 13:01:28 +00:00
parent b124875c50
commit 580762f388
1 changed files with 12 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp
View File

@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
return arg.data == 0;
}
// Equivalent to the struct TData from CodeGear bug report 51854
// "Value-initialization: POD struct should be zero-initialized",
// reported by me (Niels Dekker, LKEB) in 2007:
// http://qc.embarcadero.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=51854
struct int_struct
{
int data;
@ -120,7 +124,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
// Equivalent to the Stats class from GCC Bug 33916,
// "Default constructor fails to initialize array members", reported by
// "Default constructor fails to initialize array members", reported in 2007 by
// Michael Elizabeth Chastain: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916
class int_array_pair
{
@ -195,6 +199,10 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
// An aggregate struct of a non-POD class and an int.
// Similar to struct A from Microsoft Visual C++ bug report 100744,
// "Value-initialization in new-expression", reported in 2005 by
// Pavel Kuznetsov (MetaCommunications Engineering):
// https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/100744
struct enum_holder_and_int
{
enum_holder e;
@ -303,8 +311,8 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
// the C++ Standard ([dcl.init]).
//
// Note: its base class, int_struct, is there to try to reproduce GCC Bug 30111,
// "Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members",
// reported by Jonathan Wakely: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111
// "Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members", reported
// by Jonathan Wakely in 2006: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111
class value_initializer: int_struct
{
private:
@ -508,7 +516,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
};
// Equivalent to the dirty_stack() function from GCC Bug 33916,
// "Default constructor fails to initialize array members", reported by
// "Default constructor fails to initialize array members", reported in 2007 by
// Michael Elizabeth Chastain: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916
void dirty_stack()
{